Broadening the lens on Zimbabwe: a response to Simukai Tinhu

Facebook Twitter Email
SJ_CK

In this blog one of our co-editors, Sarah Jane Cooper-Knock, shares her thoughts on a recent article by Simukai Tinhu on the political landscape in Zimbabwe.

 

 

 

Last Tuesday, Simukai Tinhu wrote an article that appeared on the Guardian Africa Network explaining ‘why Zimbabwean voters are deserting Morgan Tsvangirai’. This is a thought-provoking article, and Tinhu’s argument that disappointment with the MDC has grown since they entered into a power-sharing arrangement with ZANU-PF is well taken. His point that Welshman Ncube’s MDC faction might split the vote is also something that Peszisai Ruhanya noted in an earlier post for this blog.

That said, it is worth asking whether the situation is as clear-cut as Tinhu describes. The polling data to which Tinhu refers when he claims that the Zimbabwean electorate are deserting the MDC is not ‘recent’, as he suggests. Fieldwork for both the Afrobarometer and Freedom House polls were conducted in June and July of last year. Much political water has passed under the bridge since then, and more substantive evidence would be needed to argue that these numbers still hold.

Furthermore, the reasons that he gives to explain the MDC’s apparent loss of political support raise some questions. First, he claims that economic improvements will have taken the wind out of the sails of the MDC’s rallying cry to fix the economy. Yet, as he notes, many in the country remain unemployed, and are struggling to make ends meet, so it seems unlikely that a similar electoral message to 2008 would lack any appeal.

Second, Tinhu claims that corruption and personal scandals have blighted Tsvangirai’s reputation. Combined with rifts within the party, he argues, this will seriously damage the MDC’s prospects. The difficulty here is not so much what Tinhu is saying about the MDC, but what he is not saying about the scandals and divisions that threaten all of the MDC’s competitors, including the newly resurrected ZAPU-PF. By focusing in on the MDC we get an insight into their organisational challenges but not necessarily a useful perspective on the electoral landscape.

Third, he points to Mugabe’s anti-western narrative, arguing that it will mobilize support for ZANU-PF and undermine the MDC who are being caricatured as henchmen of the West. Such rhetoric, however, is hardly a new weapon in Mugabe’s arsenal, and Tinhu does not tell us why these words, which failed to have a decisive effect in 2008, would gain such traction now.

Finally, it is worth reflecting on the point with which Tinhu closes, ‘it shouldn’t come as a surprise when [the MDC] loses, even in a free and fair election’. What slips out of focus in Tinhu’s article is the very fact that Zimbabwe is unlikely to have a free and fair election. Rising police crackdowns on civil society; the arrest of high-level figures like Human Rights Lawyer Beatrice Mthetwa; and the rejection of UN election funding by the government when the organisation’s staff sought to meet with civic groups ahead of the election, all point to the possibility that ZANU-PF may seek to engineer the election.

Of course, the last thing we should pursue ahead of the polls is the beatification of the MDC: A critical eye needs to be focused on the opposition in Zimbabwe now, as ever. However, if we focus on the weaknesses of the MDC and remain silent about the flaws and abuses of their competitors, we miss the bigger analytical picture. Ultimately, the only group that gains from such a cropped perspective are ZANU-PF.

This entry was posted in Zimbabwe and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

4 Comments

  1. Posted 28 April 2013 at 8:31 pm | Permalink

    @mwendecathy: the solutions to most of Africa’s problems lies within successful #Devolution,of power,education,health,resources.

  2. Posted 30 April 2013 at 6:58 am | Permalink

    SJ,

    Couldn’t agree with you more about polls in Zimbabwe. Polling in the country has been notably spotty, and rarely current.

    The part I worry about is the anecdotes from this NYT article that was on their homepage a few weeks back: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/13/world/africa/dismay-grows-in-zimbabwe-as-underdog-party-tastes-good-life.html?pagewanted=all&gwh=CAE821F3FA524564DE51692FCF2A4135

    I worry that Mugabe may have been more shrewd than he’s given credit for and he’s been able to use the money of the state to co-opt his opposition. What do you think the prospects are for Mugabe’s departure after the next elections?

    • SJ Cooper-Knock
      Posted 22 May 2013 at 4:22 pm | Permalink

      Hey Alex. Great points. I hope that a combination of age and the new draft constitution would mean that this is the last possible round for Mugabe. Who will succeed him if ZANU-PF stays in (Joice Mujuru? Emmerson Mnangagwa?) is another question. As for underestimating him. I think that is a trap that many fall into. MDC were, I think, really outmaneuvered in the negotiations that followed the last elections…

  3. Posted 18 October 2013 at 9:06 pm | Permalink

    Hello, of course this piece of writing is actually pleasant and I have learned lot of things from it
    about blogging. thanks.

Join in the debate... let us know what you think!

  • Subscribe to the DiA Newsletter